#70797 - 14/02/200213:54Re: Cutting lame encoding time in half with --vbr-new
[Re: Ezekiel]
tfabris carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31619
Loc: Seattle, WA
This is my primary complaint about encoder comparisons-- they're all compared at 128.
This kind of comparison is useless to me because I can hear artifacts from ANY encoder at 128 if given the right material and the right listening conditions. Once you push it up to past 160, or use a decent VBR setting, I can't tell one encoder from the next.